Geoffrey Lee wrote:
True, you may think that they are not very good but it would be best
我所说的不太好是指的她们也许是老版本的翻译, 而对一个经常在变更的自由软件 新时代里,为了更多的一般普通人能够使用的话,为什么对翻译不去更新?能 我想, 只有更多的人加入这个自由软件的世界, 她才能得到更好的发展. 不过如果 各位对一般人不太欢迎的话, 我也无话可说 .
if you made a difference patch against an existing version, if you do that then some things may have already been translated for you, saving your time, and everyone else's time! :-)
非常对不起, 我又浪费了大家的宝贵时间,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:15:17PM +0900, Jun wrote:
Geoffrey Lee wrote:
True, you may think that they are not very good but it would be best
我所说的不太好是指的她们也许是老版本的翻译, 而对一个经常在变更的自由软件 新时代里,为了更多的一般普通人能够使用的话,为什么对翻译不去更新?能 我想, 只有更多的人加入这个自由软件的世界, 她才能得到更好的发展. 不过如果 各位对一般人不太欢迎的话, 我也无话可说 .
Well yes, it is true that any piece of frequently updated software may need translators as new messages may be introduced into the program. No one is stopping anyone from contributing translations but it would be best if you updated the transalation on top of an existing one, if available, that's all! :-)
if you made a difference patch against an existing version, if you do that then some things may have already been translated for you, saving your time, and everyone else's time! :-)
非常对不起, 我又浪费了大家的宝贵时间,
No every bit of work is very much appreciated! Remember all of this translation work is entirely voluntary ... however it would be better it if were a bit more systematic.
zh-l10n-archive@lists.slat.org
-
Geoffrey Lee -
Jun