Hi, Wang Jian:
I am happy to meet you! What about progress of GNOME's messages? And how many people working on this? Have any arrangement? Need help? I can share your works. Do you have any list of translation status? As same as GNOME's?
Wu Yulun
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~> eGroups eLerts It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free! http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/6/_/_/_/971229531/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: i18n-chinese-unsubscribe@egroups.com
URL to this group: http://www.egroups.com/group/i18n-chinese
Hello Wu,
It seems that only I am working on GNOME now. There were two guys before, but it seems that they are not active.
I have CVS account, so I can commit directly into the source tree. That means I can keep working efficiently, and don't need another person's help to commit translation.
If you want to help, please specify your skills :-) We need:
1. webmasters ( web pages ) 2. translators ( translation, QA ) 3. programmers ( scripts, tools )
To translate GNOME, see the attached gnome.txt
The status page on gnome.org reflects the status perfectly, so I don't want to waste my time to implement my own. But if we have a large team, we should have one
Thursday, October 12, 2000, 6:12:54 AM, you wrote:
WY> Hi, Wang Jian:
WY> I am happy to meet you! What about progress of GNOME's messages? And how WY> many people working on this? Have any arrangement? Need help? I can share WY> your works. Do you have any list of translation status? As same as GNOME's?
WY> Wu Yulun
In Taiwan, we have a i18n team translating po file for kde and they have very good result. Why not your guys join our project and tranlaste it into GB code. I think it would be more efficiency.
Best Regard, Allen
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:36:10 +0800 Wang Jian lark@linux.net.cn wrote:
Hello Wu,
It seems that only I am working on GNOME now. There were two guys before, but it seems that they are not active.
I have CVS account, so I can commit directly into the source tree. That means I can keep working efficiently, and don't need another person's help to commit translation.
If you want to help, please specify your skills :-) We need:
- webmasters ( web pages )
- translators ( translation, QA )
- programmers ( scripts, tools )
To translate GNOME, see the attached gnome.txt
The status page on gnome.org reflects the status perfectly, so I don't want to waste my time to implement my own. But if we have a large team, we should have one
Thursday, October 12, 2000, 6:12:54 AM, you wrote:
WY> Hi, Wang Jian:
WY> I am happy to meet you! What about progress of GNOME's messages? And how WY> many people working on this? Have any arrangement? Need help? I can share WY> your works. Do you have any list of translation status? As same as GNOME's?
WY> Wu Yulun
-- lark
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: i18n-chinese-unsubscribe@egroups.com
URL to this group: http://www.egroups.com/group/i18n-chinese
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~> eLerts It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free! http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/6/_/_/_/971232396/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: i18n-chinese-unsubscribe@egroups.com
URL to this group: http://www.egroups.com/group/i18n-chinese
Hello Allen,
Translation reuse is good, but here are some facts :-)
o zh_CN translation is more complete than zh_TW translation except kde-others o The almost finished translation is overlapped, so cross reference is inefficient or anti-efficient. Think about the issues wrt. minor updates, how can you do it efficient by taking out the updated lines from the other team's translated PO? o zh_TW translation misses many PO's that zh_CN team has translated. So it is more suitable for zh_TW to reuse zh_CN PO's. o Reuse imcomplete PO is anti-efficient, that means, if a PO is less than 90% complete, we should wait till it is 99% complete and then convert-modify, or we should do it now and not reuse the left 10%. o We lack scripts to do terminology conversion. So the reuse is sometime, especially for the small PO, inefficient o I haven't use KBabel, but I have heard that it is a very useful tool, with auto translation capability. Doesn't have time to try it (I use english version linux).
See http://i18n.kde.org/stats/gui/i18n-status-table.html for reference.
Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 10:46:04 AM, you wrote:
AKCH> In Taiwan, we have a i18n team translating po file for kde and they have AKCH> very good result. Why not your guys join our project and tranlaste it AKCH> into GB code. I think it would be more efficiency.
AKCH> Best Regard, AKCH> Allen
zh-l10n-archive@lists.slat.org
-
Allen K. C. Hsu -
Wang Jian -
Wu Yulun